Installing Gems from Git Repositories

Introducing Gems from Git Repositories Numerous pearls are facilitated on git archives, for example, the open vaults on Github. Be that as it may, to get the most recent variant, frequently there are no diamonds worked for you to introduce easily. Introducing from git is very simple however. To begin with, you need to comprehend what git is. Git is the thing that the designers of the library use to follow the source code and to work together. Git isn't a discharge instrument. Its critical to take note of that the form of the product you get from git could possibly be steady. It is anything but a discharge form and could contain bugs that will be fixed before the following authority discharge. The principal thing you need to do so as to introduce jewels from git is introduce git. This page of The Git Book discloses how to do this. Its somewhat direct on all stages and once its introduced, you have all that you need. Introducing a diamond from a Git vault will be a 4 stage process. Clone the Git repository.Change to the new directory.Build the gem.Install the jewel. Clone the Git Repository In Git dialect, to clone a git store is to make a duplicate of it. Would have been making a duplicate of the rspec store from github. This duplicate will be a full duplicate, the equivalent the designer will have on their PCs. You can even make changes (however you wont have the option to submit these progressions once more into the store). The main thing you have to clone a git store is the clone URL. This is given on the github page to RSpec. The clone URL for RSpec is git://github.com/dchelimsky/rspec.git. Presently just utilize the git clone order gave the clone URL. $ git clone git://github.com/dchelimsky/rspec.git This will clone the RSpec storehouse into a catalog called rspec. This catalog ought to consistently be equivalent to the last piece of the clone URL (short the .git part). Change to The New Directory This progression, as well, is direct. Basically change to the new index made by Git. $ compact disc rspec Fabricate the Gem This progression is more precarious. Diamonds are constructed utilizing Rake, utilizing the assignment called pearl. $ rake pearl It may not be that straightforward however. At the point when you introduce a pearl utilizing the diamond order, quietly out of sight it accomplishes something rather significant: reliance checking. At the point when you issue the rake order, it might return with a blunder message saying it needs another jewel introduced first, or that you have to redesign a pearl previously introduced. Introduce or overhaul this jewel utilizing either the diamond order or by introducing from git. You may need to do this multiple times relying upon what number of conditions the diamond has. Introduce the Gem At the point when the assemble procedure is finished, you will have another diamond in the pkg registry. Essentially give the relative way to this .diamond document to the jewel introduce order. Youll need director benefits to do this on Linux or OSX. $ diamond introduce pkg/gemname-1.23.gem The diamond is presently introduced and can be utilized similarly as some other pearl.

304 Case Study free essay sample

Lynn Hou, Alexander Jun, Lara Kasian, Stephen White, Jennie Zhang Jody Tolan BUAD 304 Section #14728 3 March 2011 Team Case Analysis: Are Five Heads Better Than One? For the situation â€Å"Are Five Heads Better Than One? † a recently framed advertising gathering, made out of Evan, Conner, Alexis, Derek, and Judy, neglected to revive the firm’s incomes. To begin with, the board neglected to choose a gathering of assorted people who might have the option to contribute special thoughts towards the task. The foundations of these five individuals exposed an excessive number of likenesses for the individuals to cooperate productively. The article states, â€Å"Evan, Conner, Alexis, Derek, and Judy were around a similar age, had worked for the organization for about a similar measure of time, and in light of the fact that they all would in general be agreeable, inviting, and esteemed coexisting with others, their characters appeared to work as well† (700). The executives felt that these surface-level similitudes were sufficiently adequate to assemble a group that would make a heavenly business. By all accounts, it showed up these individuals would function admirably together. Nonetheless, they didn't have the top to bottom association found inside people who share profound level qualities. Second, there is a lopsided force appropriation among the gathering individuals. Conner takes control and no one faces him, in any event, when different individuals from the gathering who have, for this situation, increasingly exact plans to contribute. There is no dissemination of duty, individuals couldn't underline singular responsibility or explain work obligations. All through the whole undertaking, Conner builds up a presumptuousness inclination. This unavoidably prompts the defeat of the advertising task. He jumps straight into the venture without increasing a reasonable imminent on what should be done and works outside of his ability when he assumes the job of being a pioneer for the customer. Third, there is an absence of contention inside the gathering. Strife can be both valuable and damaging (ruinous on the off chance that it prompts a more prominent degree of individual assault, or relationship struggle). Undertaking strife is gainful for a group since it gives security against oblivious conformity. For this situation, â€Å"P† (execution), is fluffy; as it were the promoting supervisors didn't explain what the objective would be. The group concentrates a lot on the camaraderie, as opposed to concentrating on making an advantageous business for the plasma-TV customer. Poor administration is another contributing variable and reason the undertaking comes up short. At first, the organization, â€Å"allowed [the team] as much self-rule as possible† (700). The firm proposed to give the group â€Å"freedom to oversee the undertaking all the way by concocting their own thoughts, recruiting somebody to film the business once the thought was set up, making and keeping up a spending plan, and introducing the last business to the customer. Nonetheless, this ends up being an excessive amount of self-governance for a group which cooperated for just seven days. The group isn't given enough direction or data by the executives to appropriately seek after this â€Å"home run† venture. The board doesn't give the essential advances the group ought to have taken to adequately finish the task. Likewise, as expressed previously, a solid predisposition exists towards the decision of which individuals would involve the â€Å"home run† group. The board neglected to pick bunch individuals dependent on bunch execution. Or maybe, they picked individuals dependent on surface-level characteristics, for example, age, time inside the organization, and amiability. In conclusion, there is a tremendous issue with correspondence. The promoting group made an ineffectual advertisement: there was no input from different individuals in their own gathering, the organization needing the advertisement, or the showcasing organization the gathering individuals are working for. Inside their own gathering, there is no correspondence anxiety, individuals from the promoting bunch dread making some noise and introducing their own thoughts. Conner is the overwhelming figure inside the gathering and nobody else feels they reserve the privilege to protest his thoughts. What's more, there is a feeling of descending correspondence: Conner starts to speak condescendingly to his gathering individuals, being discourteous and forcing others to concur with his thoughts. For instance, in address, our class viewed a video looking at the correspondence propensities for ladies versus men. The ladies are undeniably progressively detached, saying ‘please’ and ‘thank you’ in a broad way, while men are increasingly forceful and direct. â€Å"Are Five Heads Better Than One? † presents a similar situation. The ladies are very latent and withdraw at whatever point Conner dismisses their thoughts. Gathering think turns into a significant issue, particularly when Derek yields to Conner’s thought. Derek is the most experienced concerning the TV customer since he had worked with the customer on past tasks; this offers his input the most believability. This happened during a conversation action in the ELC. An understudy in this conversation segment had taken a class on getting by in the Arctic wild. Her gathering individuals disregarded her experience when understudies were approached to rank the â€Å"objects that would be of most use if a plane had smashed in no place on a cold island. † Even however she was officially prepared, she was excessively uninvolved and didn't present her thoughts well. This drove different individuals to totally excuse her preparation: an identical representation of what this case group experienced. A valuable answer for the group is make various stages being developed and organizing an increasingly steady methodology towards their undertaking. In the primary stage, colleagues ought to ‘test the waters’ to deal with the gathering elements while figuring out what kinds of practices are satisfactory. In stage two, the gathering ought to make a raging stage, one with intragroup clash, in which individuals acknowledge the presence of the gathering however oppose the requirements forced on distinction. In stage three, the Norming stage, the individuals ought to grow cozy connections and shape cohesiveness inside the gathering. This gives the gathering a solid feeling of gathering character and structure. At the point when this Norming stage is finished, the gathering structure sets and comprehends a typical arrangement of desires that diagrams right part conduct. In stage four, the performing stage, the gathering structure ought to be completely working and tolerating. Now, individuals ought to have the option to complete the undertaking. The gathering vitality moves from getting ‘acquainted and seeing each other’ to ‘performing the job needing to be done. In the last stage, the Adjourning stage, individuals would get ready to disband, wrapping up exercises being centered around as opposed to high assignment execution. Notwithstanding this arrangement, our group has thought of two elective strategies, which could likewise be utilized to patch the issues this adve rtising bunch experienced. The principal elective arrangement, â€Å"Management Restructuring,† recommends exclusively patching up the supervisory group. The subsequent other option, â€Å"The Multi-Step Process,† includes a progression of steps, which whenever followed, would explain the current issue. The initial step includes showcasing directors choosing a gathering that is all around broadened and has demonstrated achievement before. Instead of making a gathering dependent on singular achievement, the promoting organization assembles a gathering dependent on various inside traits. The subsequent stage includes promoting administrators clarifying the objective of the business to the gathering individuals. In this progression, the supervisors would firmly push the gathering to examine the organization in advance, to plot what the customer needs, and to give a false task preliminary test to see how the gathering performs together. This forestalls Conner from dominating and decimating the venture. Furthermore, the showcasing supervisors ought to give self-appraisal tests, for example, the Myers Briggs test, so the gathering may see with their own eyes how they respond in different circumstances. Next, the organization should investigate what the customer wants for their advertisement. The gathering needs to recognize the client’s qualities, needs, and culture so as to get to and pass on the client’s legitimate picture. The customer needed a more tasteful business instead of a school party scene, a scene which could have been maintained a strategic distance from with such information. A short time later, the gathering should conceptualize their thoughts. The gathering didn't discuss how they would approach doing the undertaking. In any case, it is pivotal for them to evaluate and execute the phases of gathering advancement. By bobbing thoughts off of one another, it would empower them to get a more extensive point of view of what they truly need to achieve. For this situation, Conner was the main part who contributed thoughts. In conclusion, the gathering needs progress reports. Firm chiefs should converse with every person in the gathering with no different member’s impact to survey how things are going. The directors additionally need an advancement report and a gathering with the group in general to talk about how the venture is tagging along and to decode whether the undertaking is going the correct way or not. Our group has arrived at the resolution that the subsequent arrangement could be the most ideal approach to do the undertaking. We feel it would permit the group to get a genuine feeling of how they have to move toward this promoting effort to make the customer really fulfilled.

Book Riots Deals of the Day for July 31st, 2019

Book Riot’s Deals of the Day for July 31st, 2019 Sponsored by The Line Between by New York Times bestselling author Tosca Leeâ€"just $1.99 for a limited time. These deals were active as of this writing, but may expire soon, so get them while they’re hot! Todays  Featured Deals How to Write an Autobiographical Novel by Alexander Chee for $2.99. Get it here,  or just click on the cover image below. Liliths Brood: The Complete Xenogenesis Trilogy for $3.99. Get it here,  or just click on the cover image below. Defining Moments in Black History: Reading Between the Lies by Dick Gregory for $1.99. Get it here,  or just click on the cover image below. In Case You Missed Yesterdays Most Popular Deals Girls of Paper and Fire by Natasha Ngan for $2.99.  Get it here,  or just click on the cover image below. Feel Free by Zadie Smith for $3.99.  Get it here,  or just click on the cover image below. Previous Daily Deals That Are Still Active As Of This Writing (Get em While Theyre hot!): The Cutting Season by Attica Locke for $1.99. Infomocracy (Book One of the Centenal Cycle) by Malka Older for $2.99. We Were Liars by E. Lockhart for $1.99. Vacuum in the Dark: A Novel by Jen Beagin for $2.99. New Suns: Original Speculative Fiction by People of Color Edited By Nisi Shawl for $0.99. Fried Green Tomatoes at the Whistle Stop Cafe by Fannie Flagg for $1.99. The James Beard Cookbook by James Beard for $1.99 Mapping the Interior by Stephen Graham Jones for $3.99 Ancillary Justice by Ann Leckie for $3.99 The Casquette Girls by Alys Arden for $0.99 Is Everyone Hanging Out Without Me? (And Other Concerns) by Mindy Kaling for $2.99 The Bees by Laline Paull for $1.99 The Book of M: A Novel  by Peng Shepherd for $1.99 The Unexpected Inheritance of Inspector Chopra  by Vaseem Khan for $2.99 Grace and Fury  by Tracy Banghart for $2.99 Shuri (2018 #1)  by Nnedi Okorafor for $1.99 The Secret Wisdom of Nature by Peter Wohlleben for $2.99 The Only Harmless Great Thing by Brooke Bolander for $1.99 Apollo 8: The Thrilling Story of the First Mission to the Moon by Jeffrey Kluger for $3.99 Sing, Unburied, Sing by Jesmyn Ward for $2.99 Rosewater by Tade Thompson for $2.99 The Long Way to a Small, Angry Planet by Becky Chambers for $1.99 Family Trust  by Kathy Wang for $1.99 Black Fortunes: The Story of the First Six African Americans Who Escaped Slavery and Became Millionaires by Shomari Wills for $1.99 Dim Sum of All Fears: A Noodle Shop Mystery by Vivien Chien for $2.99 The Black Gods Drums by P. Djèlí Clark for $1.99 Gods, Monsters, and the Lucky Peach by Kelly Robson for $1.99 The Psychology of Time Travel by Kate Mascarenhas for $1.99 My Soul to Keep by Tananarive Due for $0.99 All Systems Red: The Murderbot Diaries by Martha Wells for $3.99 An Unkindness of Ghosts by Rivers Solomon for $2.99 Jade City by Fonda Lee for $2.99 Heart Berries: A Memoir by Terese Marie Mailhot for $3.99 Chasing New  Horizons: Inside the Epic First Mission to Pluto by Alan Stern and David Grinspoon for $3.99 A Princess in Theory: Reluctant Royals by Alyssa Cole for $1.99 Here to Stay by Sara Farizan  for $1.99 Lillian Boxfish Takes a Walk  by Kathleen Rooney for $3.99 The Hare With Amber Eyes  by Edmund de Waal  for $3.99 A Big Ship at the Edge of the Universe by Alex White  for $2.99 Artificial Condition  by Martha Wells  for $2.99 Beneath the Sugar Sky  by Seanan McGuire  for $2.99 Silver in the Wood by Emily Tesh for $3.99 A Curious Beginning  by Deanna Raybourn  for $2.99 Storm Front  by Jim Butcher (Book One of the Dresden Files)  for $2.99 Guapa  by Saleem Haddad for $1.99 Hogwarts: an Incomplete and Unreliable Guide  by J.K. Rowling  for $2.99 Short Stories from Hogwarts  by J.K. Rowling  for $2.99 The Paper Magician by Charlie N. Holmberg for $1.99 The Girl with the Red Balloon by Katherine Locke  for $1.99 The Invisible Library by Genevieve Cogman for $0.99 Half-Resurrection Blues by Daniel José Older for $2.99 Cant Escape Love by Alyssa Cole for $1.99 Leaves of Grass by Walt Whitman for $0.99. The Haunting of Tram Car 015 by P. Djèlí Clark for $3.99 A Quiet Life in the Country by T E Kinsey for $3.99 Empire of Sand by Tasha Suri for $4.99 Life and Death in Shanghai by Nien Cheng for $4.99 Binti  by Nnedi Okorafor for $1.99 Binti: Home  by Nnedi Okorafor for $2.99 Binti: The Night Masquerade by Nnedi Okorafor for $3.99 Instant Pot ®  Obsession: The Ultimate Electric Pressure Cooker Cookbook for Cooking Everything Fast by Janet A. Zimmerman for $2.99 Tell the Truth Shame the Devil by Lezley McSpadden with Lyah Beth LeFlore for $0.99 Magic Bites by Ilona Andrews for $2.99 Once Ghosted, Twice Shy by Alyssa Cole for  $1.99 Whatever Happened to Interracial Love? by Kathleen Collins for $3.99 In Search of Lost Time: Volumes 1-7  by Marcel Proust  for $0.99 Prime Meridian  by Silvia Moreno-Garcia for $3.99 The Mirror Empire by Kameron Hurley for $2.99 I Met a Traveller in an Antique Land  by Connie Willis for $0.99 Soy Sauce for Beginners by Kirstin Chen for $3.99 Silver Phoenix by Cindy Pon for $2.99 A Curious Beginning by Deanna Raybourn for $2.99 George by Alex Gino for $3.99 Destinys Captive by Beverly Jenkins for $1.99 A Rogue By Any Other Name by Sarah MacLean for $1.99 The Price of Salt by Patricia Highsmith for $0.99 Sign up for our Book Deals newsletter and get up to 80% off books you actually want to read.

Fi515 Chapter 1 Mini Case - 2299 Words

MINI CASE a. Why is corporate finance important to all managers? Corporate finance is important to all managers because it provides managers the skills needed to identify and select the corporate strategies and individual projects that add value to their firm and forecast the funding requirements of their company and devise strategies for acquiring those funds. b. Describe the organizational forms a company might have as it evolves from a start-up to a major corporation. List the advantages and disadvantages of each form. The organizational forms a company might have as it evolves from a start-up to a major corporation are proprietorship, partnership, or corporation. The advantages of a proprietorship are: †¢ Easy and†¦show more content†¦Failure to handle these situations properly can lead to huge product liability suits and even bankruptcy. e. What three aspects of cash flows affect the value of any investment? The three aspects of cash flows the affect the value of any investment are the amount of expected cash flows, the timing of the cash flow stream, and the risk of the cash flows. f. What are free cash flows? Free cash flows are the monies available for distribution to all investors after paying current expenses, taxes, and making the investments necessary for growth. g. What is the weighted average cost of capital? The weighted average cost of capital is the rate that a company is expected to pay on average to all its security holders to finance its assets. h. How do free cash flows and the weighted average cost of capital interact to determine a firm’s value? Free Cash Flow = Sales Revenues – Operating Costs and Taxes – Required Investments in Operating Capital. Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC) is affected by market interest rates, market risk aversion, cost of debt, cost of equity, firm’s debt/equity mix, and firm’s business risk. Therefore, free cash flows and the weighted average cost of capital interact to determine a firm’s value by the following equation: Value = FCF1 + FCF2 + †¦ + FCF00 (1 + WACC)1 (1 + WACC)2 (1 + WACC)00 i. Who are the providers (savers) and users (borrowers) of capital? How is capital

The Great War - 1254 Words

The Great War The Great War, which is more commonly called World War I began on July 28, 1914 and lasted until November 11, 1918. It was a global war centered in Europe and involved more than 70 million military personnel. There were over 9 million combatants, and 7 million civilians died as a result of the war (Keegan, 1998). It was one of the deadliest recorded military conflicts in history, and was the reason for numerous major political changes. The main event that led to the spark of World War I was the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand, Who was the heir to the Austro-Hungarian throne (Willmott, 2003). Archduke Franz Ferdinand was a friend to Kaiser Wilhelm of Germany, the two met in mid-June 1914 to discuss†¦show more content†¦The United States later declared war on German ally Austria-Hungary on December 7, 1917 (Keegan, 1998). Germany’s resumption of submarine attacks on passenger and merchant ships in 1917 became the primary motivation behind Wilson’s decis ion to lead the United States into World War I. Following the sinking of an unarmed French boat, the Sussex, in the English Channel in March 1916, Wilson threatened to sever diplomatic relations with Germany unless the German Government refrained from attacking all passenger ships and allowed the crews of enemy merchant vessels to abandon their ships prior to any attack. On May 4, 1916, the German Government accepted these terms and conditions (Keegan, 1998). This has come to be known as the Sussex Pledge. The situation in Germany had changed during January 1917. During a conference with representatives from the German Navy helped convince the military leadership and Kaiser Wilhelm that a resumption of unrestricted submarine warfare could help defeat Great Britain within a matter of months (History.com). German policymakers argued that they could violate the Sussex pledge since the United States could no longer be considered a neutral party after supplying ammunition and financial a ssistance to the Allies. German Chancellor Theobald von Bethmann-Hollweg disagreed and believed that resuming submarine warfare would draw the United States into the war on behalf of the Allies (Willmott,Show MoreRelatedThe War Of The Great War1482 Words   |  6 Pagesthe Great War had ended, leaving mostly Western Europe scathed by conflict between nations. With groundbreaking technology the conflict proved to be one of the most devastating in world history, especially with the immense amount of casualties of over 38 million. Picking itself up from the ground that was stained with blood, Europe at the time did not have any idea of the conflict that would soon follow approximately twenty years after; another world war. It is the end of the first world war conflictRead MoreThe War Of The Great War Essay973 Words   |  4 Pages World War â…   was such a significant war in history, that contributed to many changes to the world today. From 1914 to 1918 the â€Å"Great War† was being fought between the central and allied forces. The trench warfare during the rough years provided a stalemate, a situation in which no progress can be made or no advancement is possible. So, as a result the allied forces made a peace treaty to finally end the prolonged bloodshed. After five long years of nations constantly fighting, the allied forcesRead MoreThe War Of The Great War1421 Words   |  6 Pagesnations began World War I with a glamorous vision of war, only to be psychologically shattered by the realities of the trenches. The experience changed the way people referred to the glamour of battle; they treated it no longer as a positive quality but as a dangerous illusion.† Virginia Postrel The Great War began on July 28, 1914. There are several causes of the war and several of them start in the Balkans. The causes were political, territorial and economic conflicts among the great European powersRead MoreThe War Of The Great War1520 Words   |  7 Pages World War One, appropriately named the Great War in the heat of its battles, was the war that many thought would end all other wars. And at the time, it certainly seemed that would be the case. It was a new type of a war, there were new, terrifying weapons, leading to deaths in numbers unseen from previous wars. The battles dragged on, it became trench warfare. There seemed to be no end in sight for the longest time. But the war did end and the people and politicians of the 1920s were left to dealRead MoreThe War Of The Great War1553 Words   |  7 Pagesbills were proposed. However, in 1912, the third Home Rule bill was passed in Westminster, only to be suspended upon British entrance into the First World War. Irish members of Parliament that had been pushing for Home Rule for many years finally saw their plans come to fruition, only to be stalled by the outbreak of the Great War. This war was costly, and required significant support from the United Kingdom and it’s respec tive colonies. The actions of the British government helped to fuel radicalRead MoreThe War Of The Great War3373 Words   |  14 Pagesrace, and military plans created a perfect situation for a war in Europe, which would eventually become the Great War. With Germany, Great Britain, France, and Russia being the top powers in Europe, these countries would be the front runners in the discussion of the topics mentioned above and how their participation in those topics eventually led to the Great War. The order of topics to discuss that would ultimately lead to the Great War would be Imperialism being the spark that would lead to anRead MoreThe Great War Essay1454 Words   |  6 Pagesdisagree about the causes of the Great War as there are numerous different sources of the conflict, both long term and short term. The assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand is considered the catalyst that sparked the war but there are deeper, more complex reasons for its beginning. The extensive alli ance system throughout Europe, as well as the German foreign policy of expansionism helped to ignite what was a relatively small international conflict into a worldwide war. Imperial tensions also addedRead MoreThe Great War748 Words   |  3 Pages â€Å"The Great War† On 28 June 1914, a Serbian shot an Austrian. Within six weeks, many of the countries of Europe had become involved in a war that was to cause the deaths of 10 million soldiers, but was the assassination the only cause of war? WWI wasnt just any war, it was also a new beginning and a new cause for a few of the european countries that had been involved. The end results for Germany had been the worst, which not only caused Germany to have a new purpose and have resentments,Read MoreThe Great War1416 Words   |  6 PagesWorld War One was a time of devastation for Europe. Many factors lead to great tensions in Europe, sparking the desideratum for a war. This war, other sagacious ken as The Great War, occurred in 1914 until 1918. It had many famous battles, such as The Battle of Tannenberg, a battle of many casualties, especially for the Russia. The war was mainly fought between the members of the Triple Alliance and the members of The Triple Entente. Eventually, countries such as t he USA joined in. Rivalries betweenRead MoreThe Great War1256 Words   |  5 PagesThe Great War may be perceived as a milestone historical event serving two intertwined roles in the course of 20th-century British politics. Firstly, on certain grounds, it provided a fertile soil for the justified continuation and extension of a rather radical social reform initiated under the Liberal leadership since 1906, thus shifting the politics towards a more big-government-oriented direction. In the early post-war years, it was suitable for the Conservatives to undertake this task on the

Nobel Prize Winner James Watson Free Essays

Among the most notable and controversial Nobel Prize recipients is James Watson. He, together with Francis Crick and Maurice Wilkins, was awarded the Nobel Prize in the year 1962 in the Physiology or Medicine category. He is one of the scientists who discovered the molecular structure of the DNA which is hailed as one of the great breakthroughs in the field of Sciences. We will write a custom essay sample on Nobel Prize Winner: James Watson or any similar topic only for you Order Now James Dewey Watson was born on April 6, 1928 in Chicago, Illinois. In his early life, he was said to be fond of bird-gazing together with his father. When he was 12 years old, he was part of the famous radio show entitled Quiz Kids, a game which challenged young students to a quiz contest. At the age of 15, Watson entered the University of Chicago with the help of the then liberal policy of Robert Hutchins, the University president. In 1946, his interest in the field of science changed from his former concern on ornithology to genetics after he had read What Is Life? by Erwin Schrodinger. In 1947, he received his Bachelor’s degree in Zoology from the same university. Among Watson’s foremost influences was Salvador Luria, also a Nobel Prize winner. He was engrossed to the latter’s work which exposed him on the nature of genetic mutations. In the first months of 1948, Watson started to pursue his Ph.D. research at Indiana University at Luria’s laboratory. He was able to meet with another Nobel Prize recipient Max Delbruck. Delbruck and Luria were the pioneers of the Phage Group, a movement of geneticists who underwent studies and researches on microbial genetics. Eventually, Watson was also able to work with the group as a working scientist. His experience with the Phage group opened up his scientific knowledge on the nature and structure of genes. In order to develop his knowledge about the components of a gene, he took a course with another scientist Feliz Haurowitz in 1949 in which he was able to gain the conventional views on genes such as genes were proteins and vice versa; that genes have the capacity to replicate themselves; and other scientific data about the DNA. But through with all those knowledge, Watson was also fascinated with the work of Oswald Avery explaining that DNA was indeed the genetic molecule. Towards his doctoral studies, he underwent X-rays researches which attempted to de-motivate bacterial viruses. In 1950, he received his Ph.D. in Zoology at Indiana University. To be able to enhance more his knowledge on genetics and genetic composition, Watson went to Europe to pursue a postdoctoral study. He stayed at the laboratory in Copenhagen owned by a biochemist named Herman Kalckar whose studies were also linked with the nucleic acids. Through his stay with Kalckar’s laboratory, he was able to conduct experiments with another member of the Phage group, Ole Maaloe. The latter’s studies and researches were concerned on the DNA and the earlier supposition that it is the genetic molecule. In a meeting in Italy where he accompanied Kalckar, he met Maurice Wilkins who was also a devoted geneticist. In an event, Wilkins had shown Watson an X-ray diffraction data for DNA (which was originally worked out by Rosalind Franklin). After seeing the X-ray, he came to a conclusion that DNA had a distinct structure. Watson attempted to discover this through his experimental research done in different universities. Watson came to a decision to be familiar with performing X-ray diffraction experiments for the reason that such undertaking would lead him to a more probable and easier discovery of the DNA structure (He was inspired by Linus Pauling who was able to publish the protein alpha helix model with his unremitting efforts in undergoing X-ray experiments on molecular model. In 1951, Watson, together with Francis Crick and Maurice Wilkins, started to work out a series of experimental researches using Franklin’s X-ray findings on DNA structure. A controversy was said to occur during the period of experimental researches among Watson, Crick and Wilkins for the reason that they were using Franklin’s data and findings without the latter’s knowledge and consent. To further study Franklin’s X-ray findings, Watson attended one of Franklin’s seminar by which she explained how she obtained her findings on the DNA structure. Originally, Franklin claimed that the DNA was structured in helix-form. With this, Watson had started again to construct a molecular model but in the end it was criticize by Franklin by saying that the phosphate backbones must not be in the inside but on the outside. Eager to finish their attempt, the two used Franklin’s observations in their ultimate attempt to arrive at the DNA structure model. However, 1951, the absolute details of the chemical structure of the backbone of the DNA were identified by Alexander Todd, a biochemist. With that, Watson and Crick were asked to stop working with the DNA structure in 1952. Yet the two had never completely put aside their desire to come up with the DNA structure model. After numerous trips which exposed Watson and Crick to different methods and experimental systems that could help them in their account on DNA structure model, they were again asked to continue working on the DNA structural model by the then laboratory director Maurice Wilkins. Through the years, Franklin’s findings progresses and even developed.   The two, again, used Franklin’s findings in their experimental research on the DNA structure. The most outstanding contribution of Watson in the entire pursuit of the structural model of the DNA was his discovery of the nucleotide base pairs. These base pairs are said to be the chief answer in solving the structure and function of the DNA. Watson used the Pauling tradition, which he was formerly exposed. On February 1953, Watson worked out a molecule model which used a straight periphery, and exacto blade, white cardboard and adhesive. He made the molecules flat in their loop so that he could slide the cardboard models and inspect how they work. Through such improvised models, Watson saw that the bigger two ring (A and G nucleobase; also referred as the purines) could be matched with a lesser one ring (T and C nucleobases; also referred as the pyrimidines). Watson hypothesized if the tow pairs could be paired through a hydrogen bond which he discovered possible. He then observed that the two pairs could be placed over on each other with alike general configuration. To elaborate, the hexagonal rings were central and the comparative courses of the five-member rings of A and G were the identical.   Watson perceived that numerous members were falling into place such that he regarded it as the answer. He was right for formulating such conclusion. Watson’s discovery of the base pairs was unswerving with what Chargaff, also a biochemist, had already worked out. Not so long that Watson and Crick had completed their experimental research on the structural model of DNA by concluding the double helix form of the DNA. They presented their findings through a journal entitled Nature. With this great discovery, Watson and his co-scientists Crick and Wilkins were given the Nobel Prize in 1962 for their discovery of the structure of nucleic acids. Nevertheless, as mentioned earlier the controversy involving the original works of Franklin had put the three Nobel Prize Awardees in so much criticisms primarily with their failure to acknowledge the contribution of Franklin. But Watson took the courage to clarify the issue and appraise Franklin’s involvement in the discovery of the DNA structural model. In 1968, he published a book entitled The Double-Helix which explained his team’s side regarding the controversy with Franklin. He clarified that it was not intentional to bypass Franklin all throughout their achievements. He said that Franklin was really one of the persons who gave him the impetus to strive harder and make him more careful in analyzing his experimental research on DNA structure.   In the end, his team included Franklin as one of the most important persons behind the success of their structural model of DNA. Watson’s published book made the public realize how scientists like him undergo so much hardships for the sake of scientific discoveries which can really aid the entire mankind in uplifting the quality of their lives. He had proven that with great effort and outstanding sacrifice, anyone could victoriously achieve his or her goals. Watson did not stop his scientific endeavors with his Nobel Prize award. He worked with the Genome Project in 1988 which he held up until 1992. References: Hamilton, J. (2004). James Watson: Solving the Mystery of DNA (Nobel Prize-Winning  Ã‚   Scientists). Enslow Publishers. Watson, J. D. (2001). The Double Helix: A Personal Account of the Discovery of the  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚   Structure of DNA (First ed.). Touchstone. How to cite Nobel Prize Winner: James Watson, Essay examples

Lemon V. Kurtzman 1971 Essays - Lemon V. Kurtzman,

Lemon V. Kurtzman 1971 Lemon v. Kurtzman 1971 The name of the case is Lemon v. Kurtzman; the Chief Justice in charge of the case was Warren Burger. The case was argued on March 3, 1971 and decided on June 28, 1971. These three cases from Pennsylvania and Rhode Island involved public assistance to private schools, some of which were religious. Pennsylvania's law included paying the salaries of teachers in parochial schools, assisting the purchasing of textbooks, and other teaching supplies. In Rhode Island, the State paid 15% of the salaries of private school teachers. A federal court upheld the Pennsylvania law while a District Court ruled that the Rhode Island law fostered 'excessive entanglement'. The case is about actions challenging constitutionality of state aid to, or for the benefit of, nonpublic schools. A three-judge United States District Court for the District of Rhode Island said that the Rhode Island statute was unconstitutional, while a three-judge United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, dismissed the complaint that challenged the Pennsylvania statute, and appeals were taken. The Supreme Court, Chief Justice Burger, held that both statutes, Pennsylvania and Rhode Island, were unconstitutional under the religion clauses of the First Amendment. The Courts decision was unanimous 8-0; it determined that the case was unconstitutional. The decision stated that there are three criteria that should be used to assess legislation: First, the statute must have a secular legislative purpose; second, its principal or primary effect must be one that neither advances or inhibits religion; finally, the statute must not foster and excessive government Entanglement with religion. The teachers whose salaries are partially being paid by the State are religious agents who work under the rule of religious officials. There is an innate conflict in this situation of which the state should remain clear. To guarantee that teachers play a non-ideological role would require the state to become involved with the church. Allowing this connection could lead to political problems in areas in which a large number of students attend religious schools. American History